Why self-improvement can totally suck… and what you can do to prevent this
You’ve probably realized by now that this blog is strongly focused on self-improvement and methods of bettering your character. At the same time, it seems like this is becoming a mainstream obsession given the tremendous rise in self-improvement books, blogs (including mine), and ‘thought-leaders’ in this area. Despite how much I praise the merits of personal development – which, on the whole, I absolutely still champion because I think that committing to improving yourself is truly one of the best things you could ever do for and to yourself – there are still dangers with this practice, as with everything else in life.
I place a great value on balanced argumentation in my life and, therefore, I thought it was only fair that I apply it to my writing as well. I shouldn’t only talk about the “good” side of self-improvement; the bad stuff should also receive some attention. Because of this, I decided to do a round-up of what a various Internet Thinkers say about the negative sides of this recent fad.
Positive Thinking or Thought Control?
Olivia Goldhill from Qz cites the Danish psychologist Svend Brinkman to discuss the dangers of turning positivity into an obligation. This is the part of SI (getting tired of typing the full term out a hundred times, so let’s go with an abbreviation) that emphasizes fighting self-deprecating thoughts with “just thinking happy thoughts all the time.”
To be fair, this is something that I never really get into on Cowboy Funk because it’s somewhat counter to my style and, in hindsight, I’m happy that I don’t. I think this is a terribly misleading, oversimplified, and cliché way of looking at SI. Just think positively, stop worrying, and everything will be ok, right? I absolutely recognize the power of your mind in shaping your negative habits and, to an extent, your currently shitty predicament, but there’s a reason I constantly emphasize getting out of your head and taking action: you can’t just “think your way” to success and happiness!
Positive thinking should not be defined in this polarizing way of permanent hyper-ecstasy and excitement about the world around you. To me, positive thinking is “rational” thinking; let’s say you think girls won’t date you because you think every other guy has his shit together and you don’t, what rational proof do you actually have for this belief? Once you find that you actually don’t have concrete proof for it, you’ll (hopefully) realize that your life is not so doom and gloom after all and that you can take small, simple steps to improve your dating game.
Curiously, I agree and disagree with this statement. I agree in the sense that this notion of positive thinking spreads the idea that you are the architect of your own destruction and miserable because you’re not shooting rainbows out your ass every day. Obviously, this unfairly alienates and makes people feel guilty people on the basis of this pretty poor argumentation.
However, I do disagree in a nitpicky sense. A person’s mindset and mentality can be fundamental enablers or disablers for taking action in her life. Like I said before, if you irrationally think that you’re the worst person on the world, you won’t take action to change your life. I do hate to say this but honestly, you have to take responsibility and ownership for your own inaction, shitty mindset, and, as a result, current state in life. Then again, it's stupidly simplistic for others (or you) to say that your life sucks because you're not happy/positive all the time. It's far more nuanced than that.
All this is to say that if you don’t consciously choose to adopt an enabling and rational mindset and humbly take responsibility and ownership for the things that happen in your life, no action will ever occur. Obviously, no amount of positive (rational) thinking will change your predicament if you don’t take action, but it's an important starting point. Action and mindset are simply complimentary sides of the same coin; much in the same way that Yugi Mutou and the Pharaoh are two parts of the same body (just had to sneak in that reference there).
Finally, SI is not exclusively defined by positive thinking. If people think that this is the case, no wonder they’re scared off by this fad and prefer to just stick to the status quo. Positive thinking is simply one of the many variables of the equation of SI.
There’s something wrong with me!
Suzanne Eder gave a short but interesting TED talk about the issue of so many people following this SI obsession because of a deeper feeling that there’s something wrong with us that we need to fix.
It’s the good ol’ herd-mentality that Eder talks about here and she makes a very important point. From how I interpreted her talk, it seems like SI itself isn’t necessarily bad but instead it is the process that can be harmful to us. We look up to these experts in search of answers and cures to our imperfections and look to them to make sense of our imperfect selves. We are often more than willing to surrender ourselves in order to cure the mental discomfort we have from this urge/desire to have things be fixed.
Sounds familiar, doesn’t it? If I just do this, then everything will be fixed. If I just get that job I love, then I’ll be okay. If I just find my passion, then I’ll be happy. This reminds me of one of my favorite blog posts from the Fizzle crew that talked about this constant fixation we have on the end goal of a pursuit as the immediate and permanent cure to some existential problem in our lives (which Eder alludes to in her anecdote about her client Darla, from about 5:00 onwards).
This negative aspect of SI calls for critical thinking and perspective. When you’re reading a self-help book and taking up one of its strategies, you have to think to yourself: is this really for me? Does this feel right? Does this even make sense? On the other hand, am I doing this from a place of fear or from a place of genuine interest, curiosity, or positive desire to deepen my character? Stay critical, stay vigilant, stay alert, and you won’t fall into this trap of “giving yourself away” to the experts of the world of SI.
Remember, don’t let System 1 run rampant.
Don’t stop till you get enough!
The final piece of wisdom from the Internet regarding this self-improvement craze is painfully simple: we are Never. Freakin. Satisfied. Not only are we never happy with our material possessions, but the same is also true with our psychological state of being. Thus, this obsession for improving ourselves comes from this insatiable hunger for more, more, more in every facet of our lives, as Leo Babauta discusses very eloquently on his Zenhabits blog. People engage in SI and consume every single book, blog post, “top 10 tips” article, and guide in the world because they don’t wanna be left behind. Once again, it’s coming from a place of fear and external validation; seems to be a trend, no?
To be fair, I think this negative aspect is the least prevalent part of the problem but I can still see how it plays out because of the “Keeping up with the Joneses” mentality here. You don't wanna be the one that's left behind, right?
At the end of the day, I gather two key insights about self-improvement from these articles/videos. The first, most crucially, is that your reason/motivation for doing this absolutely has to come from a good place. If it’s coming from a place of fear, anxiety, or inferiority, then please take a step back and reevaluate. The second is the ability to zoom out and see the bigger picture because, oftentimes, the closer you look, the less you see. If you’re so obsessed with the mere attainment and/or achievement of some great goal – this so-called “tick-the-box” mentality – you’ll never understand what or who it is that you’re doing this for in the first place.
I engage in SI because I think that, given that I'm blessed with a life that is really quite good, I have an obligation to be the best person that I can be. In addition to that, it comes from a place of intellectual fascination/curiosity. I don’t see self-improvement necessarily as a process of improving oneself in the same way that one obtains a certification for a profession. No, I visualize it as a process of learning. A process of mastering a martial art. A process of understanding a skill and how it affects different areas of my life. In the same way that Vegeta could never back away from a challenge because it was what made him come alive, I can’t back down from such a challenge because the fascinating process of mastery engages and invigorates me intellectually.
At the end of the day, the choice is yours: is this self-improvement stuff really for me?
See you, Space Cowboy.